Case: Ascendant
The clue of
In a -clue lane, the skyscraper must either be in the head cell or past-peak.
| 2 | 7 |
| 2 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
Recursion
If the skyscraper is past-peak, this case recurses with the skyscraper, , and so on.
| 2 | N | … | N-1 | … | N-k |
| 2 | N-k-1 | N | … | N-1 | … | N-k |
Explanation
Really, this case arises because the skyscraper cannot be both pre-peak and not in the head cell (in a -clue lane).
| 2 | 5 | 6 |
If this is the case, the and are guaranteed to be visible. But we also have unsolved cells before the , of which at least 1 will be visible too. This means we’ll have at least 3 skyscrapers visible in total, which contradicts the -clue.
| 5 | 6 |
This cell before the -skyscraper () must be shorter than both and , so must be visible. But now we have 3 visible skyscrapers, not 2 as required!
Therefore, if the is pre-peak, it has to go in the head cell.
| 2 | 5 | 6 |
The only pre-peak cell for the is the head cell so it obscures the other pre-peak skyscrapers.
If it’s past-peak, well, then it makes no difference to the half-lane where it goes, so it can be anywhere.
| 2 | 6 | 5 |
| 2 | 6 | 5 |
Both of these are possible, since we’re outside the half-lane so the -clue can’t affect us.